this is not an atypical guide to the genera of thrips
"The only reported difference between these two species is the length of the pronotal posteroangular pair of setae (Mound et al. 1995)."
- from Held et al, 2005
The differences between the Cuban Laurel Thrips, Gynaikothrips ficorum, and the Weeping Fig Thrips, Gynaikothrips uzeli, are minimal. This seems to be a typical problem with many of the genera of thrips, and is a strong motivator for other means (Brunner et al, 2002) by which to identify individual species.
REFERENCES
- Brunner, PC; Flemming, C; Frey, JE (2002). "A molecular identification key for economically important thrips species (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) using direct sequencing and a PCR-RFLP-based approach." Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 4: 127 – 136.
- Held, DW; Boyd, D; Lockley, T; Edwards, GB (2005). "Gynaikothrips uzeli (Thysanoptera: Phlaethripidae) in the southeastern United States: distribution and review of biology." Florida Entomologist, 88(4):538 - 540.
- Mound, LA; Wang, CL; Okajima, S (1995). "Observations in Taiwan on the identity of the Cuban laurel thrips (Thysanoptera, Phlaeothripidae)." Journal of the New York Entomological Society, 103: 185 - 190.
Comments
Phew. Glad that's cleared up!
Posted by: Scott
|
October 7, 2007 3:19 AM